Libya vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Libya
4,224 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
3,986 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
164th
Namibia rank
167th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Libya
  • Namibia
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k198020012023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 4,224 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,986 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 238 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 164th and Namibia ranks 167th of 177 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,135 current US$ per square kilometre 812.98 current US$ per square kilometre 1,322 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2000s 4,880 current US$ per square kilometre 1,681 current US$ per square kilometre 3,199 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2010s 6,607 current US$ per square kilometre 3,592 current US$ per square kilometre 3,015 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 2,940 current US$ per square kilometre 2,677 current US$ per square kilometre 262.91 current US$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Libya or Namibia?
Libya, at 4,224 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,986 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Libya and Namibia?
238 current US$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Libya ranks 164th and Namibia ranks 167th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/">Libya vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.