Kazakhstan vs Timor-Leste: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
24,208 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste
24,275 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
138th
Timor-Leste rank
137th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Timor-Leste
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199220072023

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 24,275 current US$ per square kilometre against 24,208 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 67 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Timor-Leste ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 138th and Timor-Leste ranks 137th of 177 countries.

Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2000s 6,373 current US$ per square kilometre 9,302 current US$ per square kilometre 2,930 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2010s 15,353 current US$ per square kilometre 37,833 current US$ per square kilometre 22,480 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2020s 18,794 current US$ per square kilometre 25,012 current US$ per square kilometre 6,218 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 24,275 current US$ per square kilometre against 24,208 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Timor-Leste?
67 current US$ per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Timor-Leste?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 138th and Timor-Leste ranks 137th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Timor-Leste: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/timor-leste/">Kazakhstan vs Timor-Leste: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.