Indonesia vs Rwanda: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Indonesia
211,212 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
204,177 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
70th
Rwanda rank
72nd

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Indonesia
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196519942023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 211,212 current US$ per square kilometre against 204,177 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 7,035 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Rwanda ahead.

Indonesia ranks 70th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 377.09 current US$ per square kilometre 1,445 current US$ per square kilometre 1,068 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 3,118 current US$ per square kilometre 7,867 current US$ per square kilometre 4,748 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 11,210 current US$ per square kilometre 30,454 current US$ per square kilometre 19,244 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 23,819 current US$ per square kilometre 30,186 current US$ per square kilometre 6,367 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 41,458 current US$ per square kilometre 34,140 current US$ per square kilometre 7,318 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 160,133 current US$ per square kilometre 75,618 current US$ per square kilometre 84,515 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 196,464 current US$ per square kilometre 153,056 current US$ per square kilometre 43,408 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Indonesia or Rwanda?
Indonesia, at 211,212 current US$ per square kilometre against 204,177 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Indonesia and Rwanda?
7,035 current US$ per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Rwanda?
57 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Rwanda rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Indonesia ranks 70th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Rwanda: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/rwanda/">Indonesia vs Rwanda: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.