Guatemala vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
159,111 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
165,142 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
76th
Latvia rank
75th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Latvia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 165,142 current US$ per square kilometre against 159,111 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 6,031 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 76th and Latvia ranks 75th of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 25,030 current US$ per square kilometre 20,303 current US$ per square kilometre 4,727 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 46,191 current US$ per square kilometre 87,264 current US$ per square kilometre 41,073 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 80,704 current US$ per square kilometre 105,190 current US$ per square kilometre 24,486 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 134,428 current US$ per square kilometre 142,894 current US$ per square kilometre 8,466 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Latvia?
Latvia, at 165,142 current US$ per square kilometre against 159,111 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Latvia?
6,031 current US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Latvia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 76th and Latvia ranks 75th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/latvia/">Guatemala vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.