Georgia vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Georgia
95,049 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
88,852 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
90th
Kiribati rank
91st

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Georgia
  • Kiribati
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199220072023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 95,049 current US$ per square kilometre against 88,852 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 6,197 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 90th and Kiribati ranks 91st of 177 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 33,190 current US$ per square kilometre 25,904 current US$ per square kilometre 7,286 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 52,637 current US$ per square kilometre 62,163 current US$ per square kilometre 9,526 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 68,401 current US$ per square kilometre 66,136 current US$ per square kilometre 2,264 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Georgia or Kiribati?
Georgia, at 95,049 current US$ per square kilometre against 88,852 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Georgia and Kiribati?
6,197 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Kiribati rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Georgia ranks 90th and Kiribati ranks 91st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/kiribati/">Georgia vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.