Finland vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Finland
227,235 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
241,929 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
65th
New Zealand rank
62nd

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • New Zealand
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 241,929 current US$ per square kilometre against 227,235 current US$ per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 14,694 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 65th and New Zealand ranks 62nd of 177 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 24,572 current US$ per square kilometre 12,497 current US$ per square kilometre 12,075 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 64,777 current US$ per square kilometre 27,305 current US$ per square kilometre 37,472 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 90,812 current US$ per square kilometre 43,435 current US$ per square kilometre 47,377 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 150,174 current US$ per square kilometre 85,838 current US$ per square kilometre 64,335 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 196,578 current US$ per square kilometre 159,092 current US$ per square kilometre 37,486 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 227,518 current US$ per square kilometre 227,974 current US$ per square kilometre 456.5 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Finland or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 241,929 current US$ per square kilometre against 227,235 current US$ per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Finland and New Zealand?
14,694 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 65th and New Zealand ranks 62nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/new-zealand/">Finland vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.