European Union vs Macau, China: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

European Union
1.03 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
202.19 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
European Union rank
2nd
Macau, China rank
1st

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • European Union
  • Macau, China
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M197019962023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 202.19 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.03 million current US$ per square kilometre in European Union, a difference of 201.16 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 195.4 times European Union's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

European Union ranks 2nd and Macau, China ranks 1st of 43 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 235,007 current US$ per square kilometre 18.06 million current US$ per square kilometre 17.82 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 430,019 current US$ per square kilometre 67.91 million current US$ per square kilometre 67.48 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 638,901 current US$ per square kilometre 103.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 102.96 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 772,002 current US$ per square kilometre 256.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 255.74 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 945,988 current US$ per square kilometre 196.22 million current US$ per square kilometre 195.28 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, European Union or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 202.19 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.03 million current US$ per square kilometre in European Union as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between European Union and Macau, China?
201.16 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union and Macau, China?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do European Union and Macau, China rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
European Union ranks 2nd and Macau, China ranks 1st of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union vs Macau, China: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/european-union/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/european-union/macao-sar-china/">European Union vs Macau, China: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.