Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
38,549 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
38,121 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
124th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
125th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020062023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 38,549 current US$ per square kilometre against 38,121 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 428 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 125th of 177 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 167,543 current US$ per square kilometre 8,516 current US$ per square kilometre 159,027 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 171,385 current US$ per square kilometre 18,694 current US$ per square kilometre 152,692 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 34,312 current US$ per square kilometre 34,510 current US$ per square kilometre 198.6 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Equatorial Guinea, at 38,549 current US$ per square kilometre against 38,121 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
428 current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 125th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/tanzania/">Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.