Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
38,549 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
43,226 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
124th
Eswatini rank
121st

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eswatini
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k200520142023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 43,226 current US$ per square kilometre against 38,549 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 4,677 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Eswatini ranks 121st of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eswatini Difference Ahead
2010s 115,076 current US$ per square kilometre 41,625 current US$ per square kilometre 73,451 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 34,312 current US$ per square kilometre 42,247 current US$ per square kilometre 7,936 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 43,226 current US$ per square kilometre against 38,549 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
4,677 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Eswatini ranks 121st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/">Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.