Ecuador vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
96,656 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
88,852 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
88th
Kiribati rank
91st

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Kiribati
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 96,656 current US$ per square kilometre against 88,852 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 7,804 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 88th and Kiribati ranks 91st of 177 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 37,592 current US$ per square kilometre 25,904 current US$ per square kilometre 11,687 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 82,933 current US$ per square kilometre 62,163 current US$ per square kilometre 20,771 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 86,334 current US$ per square kilometre 66,136 current US$ per square kilometre 20,198 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Kiribati?
Ecuador, at 96,656 current US$ per square kilometre against 88,852 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Kiribati?
7,804 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Kiribati rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 88th and Kiribati ranks 91st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/kiribati/">Ecuador vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.