Cuba vs Montenegro: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Cuba
101,503 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Montenegro
116,132 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
85th
Montenegro rank
83rd

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Montenegro
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k197019962023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 116,132 current US$ per square kilometre against 101,503 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 14,629 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 85th and Montenegro ranks 83rd of 177 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 50,310 current US$ per square kilometre 88,067 current US$ per square kilometre 37,756 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 73,297 current US$ per square kilometre 80,231 current US$ per square kilometre 6,934 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2020s 101,503 current US$ per square kilometre 99,277 current US$ per square kilometre 2,226 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Cuba or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 116,132 current US$ per square kilometre against 101,503 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Cuba and Montenegro?
14,629 current US$ per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Montenegro?
15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Cuba and Montenegro rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 85th and Montenegro ranks 83rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Montenegro: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/montenegro/">Cuba vs Montenegro: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.