Congo vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Congo
11,173 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
10,216 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Congo rank
152nd
Suriname rank
155th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Suriname
010.0k20.0k30.0k197419982023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 11,173 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,216 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 957 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Suriname ahead.

Congo ranks 152nd and Suriname ranks 155th of 177 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 12,405 current US$ per square kilometre 8,834 current US$ per square kilometre 3,571 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 14,931 current US$ per square kilometre 10,216 current US$ per square kilometre 4,715 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Congo or Suriname?
Congo, at 11,173 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,216 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Congo and Suriname?
957 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 152nd and Suriname ranks 155th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/suriname/">Congo vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.