Colombia vs Pakistan: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Colombia
54,313 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
53,538 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
110th
Pakistan rank
112th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Pakistan
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 54,313 current US$ per square kilometre against 53,538 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 775 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 110th and Pakistan ranks 112th of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 826.5 current US$ per square kilometre 1,313 current US$ per square kilometre 486.19 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 2,062 current US$ per square kilometre 2,414 current US$ per square kilometre 351.61 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 5,897 current US$ per square kilometre 6,960 current US$ per square kilometre 1,063 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 14,097 current US$ per square kilometre 12,040 current US$ per square kilometre 2,057 current US$ per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 27,696 current US$ per square kilometre 27,873 current US$ per square kilometre 176.35 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 65,020 current US$ per square kilometre 51,515 current US$ per square kilometre 13,505 current US$ per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 53,245 current US$ per square kilometre 57,488 current US$ per square kilometre 4,242 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Colombia or Pakistan?
Colombia, at 54,313 current US$ per square kilometre against 53,538 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Colombia and Pakistan?
775 current US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Pakistan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 110th and Pakistan ranks 112th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Pakistan: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/pakistan/">Colombia vs Pakistan: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.