Chile vs Samoa: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
110,291 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
116,204 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
84th
Samoa rank
82nd

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Samoa
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 116,204 current US$ per square kilometre against 110,291 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 5,913 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Samoa ahead.

Chile ranks 84th and Samoa ranks 82nd of 177 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 55,725 current US$ per square kilometre 70,062 current US$ per square kilometre 14,337 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 86,525 current US$ per square kilometre 87,073 current US$ per square kilometre 547.59 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 97,617 current US$ per square kilometre 103,563 current US$ per square kilometre 5,947 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Samoa?
Samoa, at 116,204 current US$ per square kilometre against 110,291 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Samoa?
5,913 current US$ per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Samoa?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Chile and Samoa rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 84th and Samoa ranks 82nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Samoa: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/samoa/">Chile vs Samoa: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.