Chile vs Montenegro: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
110,291 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
116,132 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
84th
Montenegro rank
83rd

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Montenegro
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 116,132 current US$ per square kilometre against 110,291 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 5,841 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Chile ranks 84th and Montenegro ranks 83rd of 177 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 53,835 current US$ per square kilometre 88,067 current US$ per square kilometre 34,232 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 86,525 current US$ per square kilometre 80,231 current US$ per square kilometre 6,294 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 97,617 current US$ per square kilometre 103,230 current US$ per square kilometre 5,613 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 116,132 current US$ per square kilometre against 110,291 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Montenegro?
5,841 current US$ per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Chile and Montenegro rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 84th and Montenegro ranks 83rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Montenegro: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/montenegro/">Chile vs Montenegro: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.