Chile vs Cuba: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
110,291 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
101,503 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Chile rank
84th
Cuba rank
85th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Cuba
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 110,291 current US$ per square kilometre against 101,503 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 8,788 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Chile ranks 84th and Cuba ranks 85th of 177 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Cuba Difference Ahead
1970s 2,788 current US$ per square kilometre 28,542 current US$ per square kilometre 25,754 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 5,897 current US$ per square kilometre 55,210 current US$ per square kilometre 49,313 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 21,390 current US$ per square kilometre 33,550 current US$ per square kilometre 12,160 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 37,094 current US$ per square kilometre 38,976 current US$ per square kilometre 1,882 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 86,525 current US$ per square kilometre 73,297 current US$ per square kilometre 13,228 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 77,174 current US$ per square kilometre 101,503 current US$ per square kilometre 24,329 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Cuba?
Chile, at 110,291 current US$ per square kilometre against 101,503 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Cuba?
8,788 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Cuba?
51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
How do Chile and Cuba rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 84th and Cuba ranks 85th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Cuba: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/cuba/">Chile vs Cuba: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.