Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
463,396 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
13.51 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
5th
Malta rank
6th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Malta
05.0M10.0M15.0M197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 13.51 million current US$ per square kilometre against 463,396 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 13.05 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 29.2 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Malta ranks 6th of 43 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 89,402 current US$ per square kilometre 3.00 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.91 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 195,732 current US$ per square kilometre 4.13 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.94 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 281,542 current US$ per square kilometre 7.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.12 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 387,238 current US$ per square kilometre 13.06 million current US$ per square kilometre 12.67 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Malta?
Malta, at 13.51 million current US$ per square kilometre against 463,396 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta?
13.05 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Malta ranks 6th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/malta/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.