Cameroon vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Cameroon
19,772 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
15,748 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
144th
Guinea-Bissau rank
147th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • Guinea-Bissau
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197519992023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 19,772 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,748 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 4,024 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Cameroon ranks 144th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 147th of 177 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 4 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1970s 3,037 current US$ per square kilometre 1,972 current US$ per square kilometre 1,065 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 4,092 current US$ per square kilometre 4,681 current US$ per square kilometre 588.95 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 4,159 current US$ per square kilometre 7,103 current US$ per square kilometre 2,944 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 7,485 current US$ per square kilometre 4,588 current US$ per square kilometre 2,897 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 13,662 current US$ per square kilometre 8,259 current US$ per square kilometre 5,403 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 17,609 current US$ per square kilometre 14,798 current US$ per square kilometre 2,812 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Cameroon or Guinea-Bissau?
Cameroon, at 19,772 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,748 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau?
4,024 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau?
46 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 144th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 147th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/guinea-bissau/">Cameroon vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.