Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
8,730 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8,972 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
158th
Zimbabwe rank
157th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 8,972 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,730 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 242 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Botswana ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 24.18 current US$ per square kilometre 477.34 current US$ per square kilometre 453.16 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 194.59 current US$ per square kilometre 1,607 current US$ per square kilometre 1,412 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 810.16 current US$ per square kilometre 2,994 current US$ per square kilometre 2,184 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 2,192 current US$ per square kilometre 3,681 current US$ per square kilometre 1,489 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 3,826 current US$ per square kilometre 1,281 current US$ per square kilometre 2,544 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 7,195 current US$ per square kilometre 6,659 current US$ per square kilometre 535.37 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 8,377 current US$ per square kilometre 7,917 current US$ per square kilometre 460.01 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 8,972 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,730 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
242 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/">Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.