Botswana vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
8,730 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
10,216 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Botswana rank
158th
Suriname rank
155th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Suriname
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196519942023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 10,216 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,730 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 1,486 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 158th and Suriname ranks 155th of 177 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 4,498 current US$ per square kilometre 8,834 current US$ per square kilometre 4,335 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 5,968 current US$ per square kilometre 10,216 current US$ per square kilometre 4,248 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Suriname?
Suriname, at 10,216 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,730 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2010.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Suriname?
1,486 current US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 158th and Suriname ranks 155th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/">Botswana vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.