Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
128,225 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
136,597 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
81st
New Caledonia rank
80th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • New Caledonia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199020062023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 136,597 current US$ per square kilometre against 128,225 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 8,372 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 81st and New Caledonia ranks 80th of 177 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 24,029 current US$ per square kilometre 42,260 current US$ per square kilometre 18,231 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 60,450 current US$ per square kilometre 107,941 current US$ per square kilometre 47,491 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 79,084 current US$ per square kilometre 184,964 current US$ per square kilometre 105,879 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 106,965 current US$ per square kilometre 140,032 current US$ per square kilometre 33,067 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 136,597 current US$ per square kilometre against 128,225 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
8,372 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 81st and New Caledonia ranks 80th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.