Bhutan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Bhutan
35,237 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
38,121 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
128th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
125th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k198020012023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 38,121 current US$ per square kilometre against 35,237 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 2,884 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 128th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 125th of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 2,617 current US$ per square kilometre 1,610 current US$ per square kilometre 1,007 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 11,970 current US$ per square kilometre 6,005 current US$ per square kilometre 5,965 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 33,478 current US$ per square kilometre 18,694 current US$ per square kilometre 14,785 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 33,475 current US$ per square kilometre 34,510 current US$ per square kilometre 1,035 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 38,121 current US$ per square kilometre against 35,237 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
2,884 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 128th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 125th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/tanzania/">Bhutan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.