Bermuda vs Macau, China: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Bermuda
17.87 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
202.19 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda rank
4th
Macau, China rank
1st

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bermuda
  • Macau, China
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M198220022023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 202.19 million current US$ per square kilometre against 17.87 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda, a difference of 184.32 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 11.3 times Bermuda's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Bermuda ranks 4th and Macau, China ranks 1st of 177 countries.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Macau, China Difference Ahead
2010s 15.86 million current US$ per square kilometre 256.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 240.65 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 17.29 million current US$ per square kilometre 196.22 million current US$ per square kilometre 178.93 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Bermuda or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 202.19 million current US$ per square kilometre against 17.87 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Bermuda and Macau, China?
184.32 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Macau, China?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Bermuda and Macau, China rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bermuda ranks 4th and Macau, China ranks 1st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Macau, China: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/macao-sar-china/">Bermuda vs Macau, China: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.