Belarus vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Belarus
80,538 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
88,852 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
94th
Kiribati rank
91st

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Kiribati
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k199220072023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 88,852 current US$ per square kilometre against 80,538 current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 8,314 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 94th and Kiribati ranks 91st of 177 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 78,216 current US$ per square kilometre 25,904 current US$ per square kilometre 52,312 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 97,322 current US$ per square kilometre 62,163 current US$ per square kilometre 35,160 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 76,350 current US$ per square kilometre 66,136 current US$ per square kilometre 10,214 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Belarus or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 88,852 current US$ per square kilometre against 80,538 current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Belarus and Kiribati?
8,314 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Kiribati rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 94th and Kiribati ranks 91st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/kiribati/">Belarus vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.