Estonia vs Oman: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Estonia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 10.52 billion current LCU against 10.08 billion current LCU in Estonia, a difference of 436.90 million current LCU.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Oman ahead.
Estonia ranks 150th and Oman ranks 148th of 180 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 998.98 million current LCU | 1.14 billion current LCU | 142.50 million current LCU | Oman |
| 2000s | 3.50 billion current LCU | 4.08 billion current LCU | 580.18 million current LCU | Oman |
| 2010s | 5.43 billion current LCU | 9.87 billion current LCU | 4.44 billion current LCU | Oman |
| 2020s | 9.30 billion current LCU | 9.67 billion current LCU | 367.71 million current LCU | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Estonia or Oman?
- Oman, at 10.52 billion current LCU against 10.08 billion current LCU in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Estonia and Oman?
- 436.90 million current LCU, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Oman?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Oman rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Estonia ranks 150th and Oman ranks 148th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.