Belarus vs Estonia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Belarus
242,206 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia
228,062 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
144th
Estonia rank
146th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Estonia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 242,206 current LCU per square kilometre against 228,062 current LCU per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 14,144 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.

Belarus ranks 144th and Estonia ranks 146th of 177 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 80.85 current LCU per square kilometre 23,566 current LCU per square kilometre 23,486 current LCU per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 9,772 current LCU per square kilometre 82,540 current LCU per square kilometre 72,768 current LCU per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 115,440 current LCU per square kilometre 126,398 current LCU per square kilometre 10,958 current LCU per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 202,909 current LCU per square kilometre 216,393 current LCU per square kilometre 13,484 current LCU per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Belarus or Estonia?
Belarus, at 242,206 current LCU per square kilometre against 228,062 current LCU per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Belarus and Estonia?
14,144 current LCU per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Estonia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Estonia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 144th and Estonia ranks 146th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Estonia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/estonia/">Belarus vs Estonia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.