Israel vs Poland: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Israel
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 492.81 billion constant LCU against 412.25 billion constant LCU in Israel, a difference of 80.57 billion constant LCU.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 73rd and Poland ranks 70th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 172.69 billion constant LCU | 161.27 billion constant LCU | 11.42 billion constant LCU | Israel |
| 2000s | 181.34 billion constant LCU | 225.06 billion constant LCU | 43.72 billion constant LCU | Poland |
| 2010s | 274.32 billion constant LCU | 341.76 billion constant LCU | 67.44 billion constant LCU | Poland |
| 2020s | 383.61 billion constant LCU | 448.23 billion constant LCU | 64.63 billion constant LCU | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Israel or Poland?
- Poland, at 492.81 billion constant LCU against 412.25 billion constant LCU in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Israel and Poland?
- 80.57 billion constant LCU, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Poland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Poland rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Israel ranks 73rd and Poland ranks 70th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.