Germany vs Nepal: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Germany
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 758.68 billion constant LCU against 700.76 billion constant LCU in Germany, a difference of 57.92 billion constant LCU.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 59th and Nepal ranks 58th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 584.16 billion constant LCU | 284.25 billion constant LCU | 299.91 billion constant LCU | Germany |
| 2010s | 679.35 billion constant LCU | 548.22 billion constant LCU | 131.13 billion constant LCU | Germany |
| 2020s | 724.85 billion constant LCU | 814.25 billion constant LCU | 89.40 billion constant LCU | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Germany or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 758.68 billion constant LCU against 700.76 billion constant LCU in Germany as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Germany and Nepal?
- 57.92 billion constant LCU, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Nepal?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Germany and Nepal rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Germany ranks 59th and Nepal ranks 58th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.