Canada vs Poland: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Canada
- Poland
How they compare
Canada currently reports 566.24 billion constant LCU against 492.81 billion constant LCU in Poland, a difference of 73.43 billion constant LCU.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 68th and Poland ranks 70th of 168 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 286.19 billion constant LCU | 161.27 billion constant LCU | 124.92 billion constant LCU | Canada |
| 2000s | 415.13 billion constant LCU | 225.06 billion constant LCU | 190.07 billion constant LCU | Canada |
| 2010s | 524.39 billion constant LCU | 341.76 billion constant LCU | 182.62 billion constant LCU | Canada |
| 2020s | 552.39 billion constant LCU | 448.23 billion constant LCU | 104.16 billion constant LCU | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Canada or Poland?
- Canada, at 566.24 billion constant LCU against 492.81 billion constant LCU in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Canada and Poland?
- 73.43 billion constant LCU, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Poland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Canada and Poland rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Canada ranks 68th and Poland ranks 70th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.