Lower middle income vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time
- Lower middle income
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 2.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 92,157 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 2.49 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 28.1 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 54 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.
Lower middle income ranks 15th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 16th of 33 groups.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 7,432 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 813,881 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 806,449 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 1980s | 10,666 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 948,722 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 938,057 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 1990s | 15,986 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1.32 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1.30 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2000s | 31,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1.79 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2010s | 62,295 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.11 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.05 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2020s | 83,585 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.44 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.36 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Lower middle income or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 2.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 92,157 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Lower middle income and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 2.49 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Lower middle income and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
- Lower middle income ranks 15th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 16th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.