Finland vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Finland
184,780 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
162,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
61st
Serbia rank
64th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Finland
  • Serbia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019962023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 184,780 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 162,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 22,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 64th of 159 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 176,436 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 88,038 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 88,398 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 177,979 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 87,584 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 90,395 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 193,037 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 145,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 47,794 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Finland or Serbia?
Finland, at 184,780 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 162,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Finland and Serbia?
22,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Finland and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Finland ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 64th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/serbia/">Finland vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.