Belgium vs Malta: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Belgium
- Malta
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.1% against -0.1% in Malta, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.6 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 126th and Malta ranks 129th of 166 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.8% | 2.1% | 0.3% | Malta |
| 2010s | 2.6% | 8.4% | 5.8% | Malta |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 3.7% | 2.6% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Belgium or Malta?
- Belgium, at 0.1% against -0.1% in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Belgium and Malta?
- 0.2%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Malta?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Malta rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Belgium ranks 126th and Malta ranks 129th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.