Belgium vs Eswatini: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Belgium
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.3% against 0.1% in Belgium, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 2.6 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 126th and Eswatini ranks 125th of 166 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.6% | 4.2% | 0.5% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1.4% | -1.9% | 3.3% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Belgium or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.3% against 0.1% in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Belgium and Eswatini?
- 0.2%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eswatini?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Eswatini rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Belgium ranks 126th and Eswatini ranks 125th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.