Equatorial Guinea vs Moldova: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre (Bolt)

Equatorial Guinea
719,836 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre
in 2022
Moldova
724,684 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea rank
92nd
Moldova rank
91st

Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre (Bolt) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Moldova
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119912022

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 724,684 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre against 719,836 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 4,848 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Moldova ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 92nd and Moldova ranks 91st of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Moldova in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 92,542 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 509,727 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 417,185 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre Moldova
2000s 672,450 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 465,830 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 206,620 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 956,266 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 625,805 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 330,462 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 706,967 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 721,794 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 14,826 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Moldova?
Moldova, at 724,684 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre against 719,836 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Moldova?
4,848 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Moldova?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Moldova rank globally for gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 92nd and Moldova ranks 91st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Moldova: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-gdp-per-square-kilometre-3/equatorial-guinea/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-gdp-per-square-kilometre-3/equatorial-guinea/moldova/">Equatorial Guinea vs Moldova: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre
Unit
international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,284 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Gross domestic product (GDP) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.