Australia vs Kazakhstan: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre (Bolt)

Australia
174,759 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre
in 2022
Kazakhstan
186,552 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre
in 2022
Australia rank
133rd
Kazakhstan rank
131st

Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre (Bolt) over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119912022

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 186,552 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre against 174,759 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 11,793 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 133rd and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 73,754 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 49,987 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 23,767 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre Australia
2000s 107,472 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 85,681 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 21,790 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre Australia
2010s 146,682 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 152,688 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 6,007 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 167,846 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 180,306 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre 12,460 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre, Australia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 186,552 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre against 174,759 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre in Australia as of 2022.
What is the difference in gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre between Australia and Kazakhstan?
11,793 international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 133rd and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-gdp-per-square-kilometre-3/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-gdp-per-square-kilometre-3/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre
Unit
international-$ in 2011 prices per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,284 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Gross domestic product (GDP) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.