Australia vs Lithuania: Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and

Australia
26,905 US dollars, PPP converted
in 2023
Lithuania
1,328 US dollars, PPP converted
in 2023
Australia rank
9th
Lithuania rank
10th

Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and over time

  • Australia
  • Lithuania
010.0k20.0k30.0k198120022023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 26,905 US dollars, PPP converted against 1,328 US dollars, PPP converted in Lithuania, a difference of 25,577 US dollars, PPP converted.

That makes Australia's figure about 20.3 times Lithuania's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 9th and Lithuania ranks 10th of 30 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 20,895 US dollars, PPP converted 637.84 US dollars, PPP converted 20,257 US dollars, PPP converted Australia
2010s 25,465 US dollars, PPP converted 899.18 US dollars, PPP converted 24,566 US dollars, PPP converted Australia
2020s 26,082 US dollars, PPP converted 1,342 US dollars, PPP converted 24,739 US dollars, PPP converted Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic expenditure on r&d by sector of performance and, Australia or Lithuania?
Australia, at 26,905 US dollars, PPP converted against 1,328 US dollars, PPP converted in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic expenditure on r&d by sector of performance and between Australia and Lithuania?
25,577 US dollars, PPP converted, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lithuania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Australia and Lithuania rank globally for gross domestic expenditure on r&d by sector of performance and?
Australia ranks 9th and Lithuania ranks 10th of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and socio-economic objectives — Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D (GERD). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Lithuania: Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-expenditure-on-r-and-d-by-sector-of-performance-and-socio-economic/australia/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-expenditure-on-r-and-d-by-sector-of-performance-and-socio-economic/australia/lithuania-2/">Australia vs Lithuania: Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and socio-economic objectives — Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D (GERD)
Unit
US dollars, PPP converted
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
42 places, 1,166 data points, 1981–2024
Last refreshed

This table contains data on Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) by socio-economic objective (SEO), using the NABS 2007 classification i.e.: Exploration and exploitation of the Earth, Environment, Exploration and exploitation of space, Transport, telecommunication and other infrastructures, Energy, Industrial production and technology, Health, Agriculture, Education, Culture, recreation, religion and mass media, Political and social systems, structures and processes, General advancement of knowledge, and Defence.