Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Suriname
9,853 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Zimbabwe
9,294 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
161st
Zimbabwe rank
162nd

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Suriname
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 9,853 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,294 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 559 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Suriname ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 162nd of 184 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 9,223 current US$ per square kilometre 1,242 current US$ per square kilometre 7,981 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 9,853 current US$ per square kilometre 5,843 current US$ per square kilometre 4,010 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
Suriname, at 9,853 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,294 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2010.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
559 current US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 162nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/">Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.