Sub-Saharan Africa vs Palestine, State of: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Sub-Saharan Africa
19,929 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine, State of
775,734 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
37th
Palestine, State of rank
38th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Palestine, State of
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020062023

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 775,734 current US$ per square kilometre against 19,929 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 755,805 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 38.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 37th and Palestine, State of ranks 38th of 43 groups.

Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 4,485 current US$ per square kilometre 226,697 current US$ per square kilometre 222,212 current US$ per square kilometre Palestine, State of
2000s 8,798 current US$ per square kilometre 203,424 current US$ per square kilometre 194,625 current US$ per square kilometre Palestine, State of
2010s 17,751 current US$ per square kilometre 555,281 current US$ per square kilometre 537,530 current US$ per square kilometre Palestine, State of
2020s 18,723 current US$ per square kilometre 752,864 current US$ per square kilometre 734,142 current US$ per square kilometre Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Sub-Saharan Africa or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 775,734 current US$ per square kilometre against 19,929 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Sub-Saharan Africa and Palestine, State of?
755,805 current US$ per square kilometre, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Palestine, State of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Palestine, State of rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 37th and Palestine, State of ranks 38th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Palestine, State of: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/west-bank-and-gaza/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Palestine, State of: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.