Mauritius vs Seychelles: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Mauritius
1.40 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles
1.15 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
28th
Seychelles rank
31st

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Seychelles
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197619992023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 1.40 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.15 million current US$ per square kilometre in Seychelles, a difference of 254,320 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Seychelles's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 28th and Seychelles ranks 31st of 184 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Seychelles Difference Ahead
1970s 142,076 current US$ per square kilometre 67,368 current US$ per square kilometre 74,708 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 174,115 current US$ per square kilometre 116,953 current US$ per square kilometre 57,161 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 505,554 current US$ per square kilometre 354,149 current US$ per square kilometre 151,405 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 803,234 current US$ per square kilometre 490,976 current US$ per square kilometre 312,258 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 1.29 million current US$ per square kilometre 881,714 current US$ per square kilometre 404,994 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 1.23 million current US$ per square kilometre 781,770 current US$ per square kilometre 444,468 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Mauritius or Seychelles?
Mauritius, at 1.40 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.15 million current US$ per square kilometre in Seychelles as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Mauritius and Seychelles?
254,320 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Seychelles?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Seychelles rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 28th and Seychelles ranks 31st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Seychelles: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/seychelles/">Mauritius vs Seychelles: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.