Mali vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Mali
4,400 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
4,275 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
169th
Namibia rank
170th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mali
  • Namibia
02.0k4.0k6.0k196719952023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 4,400 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,275 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 125 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.

Mali ranks 169th and Namibia ranks 170th of 184 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 326.85 current US$ per square kilometre 423.49 current US$ per square kilometre 96.64 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 622.32 current US$ per square kilometre 853.64 current US$ per square kilometre 231.32 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 1,196 current US$ per square kilometre 1,740 current US$ per square kilometre 543.86 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 3,411 current US$ per square kilometre 3,512 current US$ per square kilometre 101.06 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 4,122 current US$ per square kilometre 2,938 current US$ per square kilometre 1,184 current US$ per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Mali or Namibia?
Mali, at 4,400 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,275 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Mali and Namibia?
125 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Mali and Namibia rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Mali ranks 169th and Namibia ranks 170th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/namibia/">Mali vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.