Kyrgyzstan vs Timor-Leste: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Kyrgyzstan
27,274 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste
28,656 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan rank
138th
Timor-Leste rank
135th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Timor-Leste
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199220072023

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 28,656 current US$ per square kilometre against 27,274 current US$ per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1,382 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 138th and Timor-Leste ranks 135th of 184 countries.

Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2000s 3,258 current US$ per square kilometre 9,218 current US$ per square kilometre 5,960 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2010s 12,410 current US$ per square kilometre 39,837 current US$ per square kilometre 27,427 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2020s 18,348 current US$ per square kilometre 27,648 current US$ per square kilometre 9,300 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Kyrgyzstan or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 28,656 current US$ per square kilometre against 27,274 current US$ per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste?
1,382 current US$ per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 138th and Timor-Leste ranks 135th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Timor-Leste: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/timor-leste/">Kyrgyzstan vs Timor-Leste: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.