European Union vs Macau, China: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

European Union
1.05 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
211.51 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
European Union rank
2nd
Macau, China rank
1st

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • European Union
  • Macau, China
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M197019962023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 211.51 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.05 million current US$ per square kilometre in European Union, a difference of 210.45 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 200.6 times European Union's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

European Union ranks 2nd and Macau, China ranks 1st of 43 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 241,602 current US$ per square kilometre 20.24 million current US$ per square kilometre 20.00 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 440,430 current US$ per square kilometre 69.65 million current US$ per square kilometre 69.21 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 651,670 current US$ per square kilometre 105.97 million current US$ per square kilometre 105.31 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 791,900 current US$ per square kilometre 265.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 264.24 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 990,241 current US$ per square kilometre 200.54 million current US$ per square kilometre 199.55 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, European Union or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 211.51 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.05 million current US$ per square kilometre in European Union as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between European Union and Macau, China?
210.45 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union and Macau, China?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do European Union and Macau, China rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
European Union ranks 2nd and Macau, China ranks 1st of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union vs Macau, China: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/european-union/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/european-union/macao-sar-china/">European Union vs Macau, China: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.