East Asia & Pacific vs Malta: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific
454,526 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
14.05 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
6th
Malta rank
6th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Malta
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 14.05 million current US$ per square kilometre against 454,526 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 13.59 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 30.9 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 6th and Malta ranks 6th of 43 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 13,810 current US$ per square kilometre 364,467 current US$ per square kilometre 350,657 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 38,749 current US$ per square kilometre 1.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.13 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 94,762 current US$ per square kilometre 2.79 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.70 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 132,612 current US$ per square kilometre 4.45 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.32 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 325,130 current US$ per square kilometre 7.47 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.14 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 448,008 current US$ per square kilometre 13.54 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.09 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific or Malta?
Malta, at 14.05 million current US$ per square kilometre against 454,526 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific and Malta?
13.59 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Malta?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Malta rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 6th and Malta ranks 6th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Malta: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/malta/">East Asia & Pacific vs Malta: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.