Denmark vs IBRD only: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
2.39 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only
181,810 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
21st
IBRD only rank
18th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • IBRD only
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 2.39 million current US$ per square kilometre against 181,810 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 2.21 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 13.2 times IBRD only's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 21st and IBRD only ranks 18th of 184 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark IBRD only Difference Ahead
1960s 86,844 current US$ per square kilometre 2,079 current US$ per square kilometre 84,765 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 240,366 current US$ per square kilometre 6,445 current US$ per square kilometre 233,920 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 415,461 current US$ per square kilometre 14,240 current US$ per square kilometre 401,221 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 824,678 current US$ per square kilometre 18,106 current US$ per square kilometre 806,573 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 1.41 million current US$ per square kilometre 41,379 current US$ per square kilometre 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 1.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 124,004 current US$ per square kilometre 1.58 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 2.33 million current US$ per square kilometre 169,638 current US$ per square kilometre 2.16 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or IBRD only?
Denmark, at 2.39 million current US$ per square kilometre against 181,810 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and IBRD only?
2.21 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and IBRD only?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Denmark and IBRD only rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 21st and IBRD only ranks 18th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs IBRD only: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ibrd-only/">Denmark vs IBRD only: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.