Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
271,600 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
277,570 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
64th
Malaysia rank
63rd

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Malaysia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 277,570 current US$ per square kilometre against 271,600 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 5,970 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 64th and Malaysia ranks 63rd of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 2,293 current US$ per square kilometre 1,436 current US$ per square kilometre 857.36 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 10,064 current US$ per square kilometre 7,724 current US$ per square kilometre 2,340 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 19,906 current US$ per square kilometre 28,347 current US$ per square kilometre 8,441 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 42,701 current US$ per square kilometre 82,522 current US$ per square kilometre 39,821 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 87,191 current US$ per square kilometre 99,424 current US$ per square kilometre 12,233 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 195,080 current US$ per square kilometre 236,507 current US$ per square kilometre 41,426 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 236,602 current US$ per square kilometre 255,994 current US$ per square kilometre 19,392 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 277,570 current US$ per square kilometre against 271,600 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Malaysia?
5,970 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Malaysia rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 64th and Malaysia ranks 63rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/malaysia/">Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.