Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
10,499 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
9,294 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
159th
Zimbabwe rank
162nd

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 10,499 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,294 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,205 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 162nd of 184 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 189.23 current US$ per square kilometre 3,744 current US$ per square kilometre 3,554 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 951.26 current US$ per square kilometre 1,202 current US$ per square kilometre 251.08 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 4,316 current US$ per square kilometre 7,394 current US$ per square kilometre 3,078 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 8,720 current US$ per square kilometre 8,514 current US$ per square kilometre 206.08 current US$ per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Zimbabwe?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 10,499 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,294 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?
1,205 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 162nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.