China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

China
800,423 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
19,929 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
37th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
37th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 800,423 current US$ per square kilometre against 19,929 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 780,494 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 40.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 37th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 37th of 184 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 27,206 current US$ per square kilometre 4,356 current US$ per square kilometre 22,850 current US$ per square kilometre China
2000s 113,963 current US$ per square kilometre 8,798 current US$ per square kilometre 105,165 current US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 500,771 current US$ per square kilometre 17,751 current US$ per square kilometre 483,020 current US$ per square kilometre China
2020s 783,587 current US$ per square kilometre 18,723 current US$ per square kilometre 764,864 current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, China or Sub-Saharan Africa?
China, at 800,423 current US$ per square kilometre against 19,929 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between China and Sub-Saharan Africa?
780,494 current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sub-Saharan Africa?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
China ranks 37th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 37th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/sub-saharan-africa/">China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.