Chile vs Georgia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
105,479 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
110,722 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
91st
Georgia rank
90th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Georgia
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 110,722 current US$ per square kilometre against 105,479 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 5,243 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 91st and Georgia ranks 90th of 184 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 25,222 current US$ per square kilometre 7,475 current US$ per square kilometre 17,746 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 38,226 current US$ per square kilometre 26,476 current US$ per square kilometre 11,750 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 89,391 current US$ per square kilometre 59,680 current US$ per square kilometre 29,710 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 96,149 current US$ per square kilometre 77,512 current US$ per square kilometre 18,637 current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Georgia?
Georgia, at 110,722 current US$ per square kilometre against 105,479 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Georgia?
5,243 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 91st and Georgia ranks 90th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Georgia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/georgia/">Chile vs Georgia: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.