Chile vs Cuba: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
105,479 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
102,129 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Chile rank
91st
Cuba rank
93rd

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Cuba
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 105,479 current US$ per square kilometre against 102,129 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 3,350 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Chile ranks 91st and Cuba ranks 93rd of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Cuba Difference Ahead
1970s 2,890 current US$ per square kilometre 29,072 current US$ per square kilometre 26,182 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 6,507 current US$ per square kilometre 55,748 current US$ per square kilometre 49,241 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 22,534 current US$ per square kilometre 29,368 current US$ per square kilometre 6,834 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 38,226 current US$ per square kilometre 44,522 current US$ per square kilometre 6,295 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 89,391 current US$ per square kilometre 78,758 current US$ per square kilometre 10,632 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 72,100 current US$ per square kilometre 102,129 current US$ per square kilometre 30,029 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Cuba?
Chile, at 105,479 current US$ per square kilometre against 102,129 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Cuba?
3,350 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Cuba?
51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
How do Chile and Cuba rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 91st and Cuba ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Cuba: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/cuba/">Chile vs Cuba: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.