Brazil vs South Africa: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
41,317 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
48,396 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
124th
South Africa rank
121st

Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • South Africa
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 48,396 current US$ per square kilometre against 41,317 current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 7,079 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Brazil ranks 124th and South Africa ranks 121st of 184 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 601.47 current US$ per square kilometre 2,463 current US$ per square kilometre 1,861 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 3,366 current US$ per square kilometre 8,416 current US$ per square kilometre 5,050 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 7,030 current US$ per square kilometre 17,294 current US$ per square kilometre 10,264 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 13,144 current US$ per square kilometre 20,620 current US$ per square kilometre 7,477 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 22,007 current US$ per square kilometre 35,825 current US$ per square kilometre 13,818 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 48,888 current US$ per square kilometre 57,527 current US$ per square kilometre 8,639 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 37,761 current US$ per square kilometre 44,972 current US$ per square kilometre 7,211 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or South Africa?
South Africa, at 48,396 current US$ per square kilometre against 41,317 current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and South Africa?
7,079 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and South Africa rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 124th and South Africa ranks 121st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs South Africa: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/south-africa/">Brazil vs South Africa: Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.